Thursday, November 27, 2014

Hidden and Conflicting Cost "ESTIMATES" for the Calrsborg Sewer.


Costs Still Unknown
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
11:26 AM
Hidden and Conflicting Cost "ESTIMATES" for the Calrsborg Sewer.

Since the time that Carlsborg had been designated as an "Urban Growth Area" (UGA) there has been an ongoing attempt by Clallam County to construct a sewer system for the entire UGA.  Repeatedly the CITIZENS of Carlsborg have asked the county what the system will "ACTUALLY COST" to construct and how much will it "COST" each of us?  Repeatedly the county has said "we don't know what the costs will be, when we know you will know". 

About 20 Carlsborg residents voice opposition to proposed sewer
By Rob Ollikainen
Peninsula Daily News

Thanks but no thanks, they said in a public hearing to extend temporary zoning for Carlsborg, because the cost will be too high.

The ESTIMATED $15 million sewer and wastewater treatment plant is a joint project of Clallam County and the Clallam County Public Utility District.  (*emphasis mine in bold )

"We don't know the cost; we know that you don't know the cost,

Costs unknown

Commissioner Steve Tharinger said the reason the county hasn't hosted more forums is because the costs are still unclear. *

"Everyone needs to know that cost -- we don't know it yet," Tharinger said. *

Carlsborg residents question need for sewer system, infrastructure in such a rural community
Posted 8/9/2012
by Sue Forde
for Citizen Review Online

a member of the audience, said he is part of the “opposition group”.  The “biggest sticking point among the residents is money,” he said.  Sequim has a high population density.  Carlsborg does not.  It’s not feasible for a sewer system when Steve Tharinger was involved:  where are the numbers, how much.  “We got the runaround,” he stated.  You need to come up with real numbers – if you don’t, it’s inappropriate to shove this down the throats of the people in Carlsborg, *

Dave said the response is unsatisfactory.  “We’ve been going to these meetings for quite awhile now,” and still there is no idea  of the cost.  “I’m assuming if you’ll be piping to Sequim, it will have an enormous cost.  We need some numbers,” he urged.
McEntire responded that “as soon as we know the numbers, you’ll know.” *

The best the county has been able to come up with thus far are "ASSUMPTIONS, ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS.
Unfortunately these are NOT the numbers we have been asking for, we want the real "COSTS".  We already know this sewer system is "FINANCIALLY INFEASIBLE", we just don't have the population or the "need" for it.

This brings us to the Carlsborg Sewer Financial Plan, February 2014, (the PLAN).

The first 12 pages of this document are solely based on "ASSUMPTIONS, PROJECTIONS AND ESTIMATES"  not the real NUMBERS.*  The problem with these "ASSUMPTIONS" begin with errors in the Carlsborg UGA population, number of Residential Units, number of businesses and growth, which lead to errors in the "ESTIMATES", "PROJECTIONS" and "APPROXIMATIONS" of costs associated with construction, number of connections, connection costs and monthly user fees. 

The key concern is the erroneous "ASSUMPTIONS" in the number of "potential connections" available which has lead to erroneous "ESTIMATES" of the $68.00 monthly user fee or $816.00 annually, this fee is based on a "BEST CASE ESTIMATE" IF they can get the required number of hookups in the first two years.  IF they don't meet this goal then the monthly cost WILL  be higher, as well as the cost of individual hookups.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

SCIENTIFIC DATA DOESN'T EXIST.

Scientific Data to Support Clallam County's 

Claim of "The Known To BE Failing or Failed On Site

Septic Systems in the Carlsborg UGA Contaminating the 

Ground Water", DOESN'T EXIST! 

The following is my letter of request for information on April 26, 2011 to the county and PUD #1 and their responses. 

Dear Carol, BOCC
I am requesting the following under The Public Disclosure Act:
All documents identifying the location of the purported known failing or failed on-site septic systems in the Carlsborg UGA, the agency reporting the failures including the results and testing method used in determining the failures and the proof of science. The test results and the agency providing the proof of science and scientific testing method used in determining the failed or failing systems contribution to the nitrate load in the ground water in the Carlsborg UGA.
 Please call or e-mail when the documents are available for pick up.
Sincerely,
Bryan Frazier

This email will serve to acknowledge receipt of your Public Records Act request in your email dated 4/26/11 below to Carol Creasey, Clallam County, Department of Community Development.  The Department of Community Development has reviewed our records and determined there are no records in our department to provide…………………………………………………
 
Thank you and please let me know if you require any further assistance from Community Development.
Cindy Swegle
Administrative Specialist IV
Clallam County Department of Community Development
223 E. 4th St., Ste. 5, Port Angeles, WA 98326
(360) 417-2321, Fax (360) 417-2443

The Commissioners’ office is not in possession of any records responsive to your request.
Trish Holden, CMC
Clerk of the Board
Commissioners' Office
223 East 4th Street, Suite 4
Port Angeles, WA 98362
P: 360.417.2234
F: 360.417.2493

Dear Mr. Frazier,
In response to your latest records request for documents identifying the location of the purported failing or failed onsite septic systems in the Carlsborg UGA, the District is not in possession of documents fitting that description. You may want to check with the County.
Sincerely,
Carla Field Public Records
 Officer Records Coordinator Clallam County PUD
V 360.565.3255
F 360.452.9338

Saturday, November 1, 2014

Public Works Trust Fund Board.

Letter to Washington State Public Works Trust Fund Board.


The following letter to the Trust Fund Board lays out the errors in the Carlsborg Waste Water Facility and Financial Plan Amendment for the Carlsborg Urban Growth Area with links to the FACTUAL numbers for the Carlsborg UGA population, housing units and the actual number of commercial properties.  I invite all who read this blog to please feel free to check my facts and please read or re-read my earlier post on Clallam County Code Enforcement, Creating Paper Water and How to Misrepresent a Rural Area as Urban.



Dear Cecilia Gardener,

I have received a copy of the Carlsborg Waste water Facility Plan Amendment – DRAFT 2014.  I once again have serious and grave concerns about the financial feasibility of the Carlsborg UGA Sewer Project. It appears that the Facilities Plan and the Financial Plan are fraught with errors, ASSUMPTIONS and PROJECTIONS stated as facts.  Upon closer scrutiny it is fictional and wish fullness not reality.

To begin, the number of  potential ERU (equivalent residential units) hookups is erroneous, the math does not show the reality of the Carlsborg UGA as follows…

Their statement: Page 8-4, An estimated 484 ERUs, 78 residential and 406 commercial,
are located within the Initial Connection Area. 
http://www.clallam.net/PublicWorks/documents/CWFDraft2.pdf

Reality: 2010 Census Carlsborg CDP (census designated place) http://www.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=53:5310075 , Population 995, 547 Residential Dwelling Units of which we know that 334 of them are in EXEMPT Mobile Home Parks leaving a total of 213 Residential Units for potential hookup.

Carlsborg UGA Economic Profile:  http://www.clallam.org/SiteAssets/resources/economic-development-reports/Carlsborg%20UGA%20Economic%20Profile%20September%202011.pdf  Pages 16-18 List Of  UGA Businesses.  There are 113 Businesses in the Carlsborg UGA not 406 as seen in this Financial Plan.

Additionally, allowing a waiver of hook up for those that have septic systems younger than 20 years old defeats to entire purpose of the sewer system in its initial construction phase and may lead property owners to defer hook up until the mandated time to do so. Example: If you have an approved onsite septic system installed this year 2014 you would not have to hook up to the sewer until your system is 20 years old or fails and is non-repairable.  These approved onsite septic systems cost can cost $30 - $50 thousand dollars and require regular testing and maintenance at owners expense and this plan offers no real adequate financial compensation for abandoning their own system for the sewer.

In addition to these errors I am concerned about the hookup fee waiver of $7,476.00 per ERU dropping the cost of hookup from $7,976.00 to $500.00 per ERU which includes businesses.  Concerning the “Get Connected” Loan Program” loans up to $3,000.00 at 3% interest for hookup costs of which the repayments would go to the county “General Fund” instead of being earmarked for O&M of the sewer system. “plan assumes that the repayments (about $70,000 per year) would go to the County WITHOUT being restricted to the Carlsborg system.” Pages 14-15 of the Plan Amendment Appendix H. http://www.clallam.net/PublicWorks/documents/CWFDraft2.pdf  This $500.00 “incentive” is not a factual accounting of the real cost of hookup and abatement of the old system as this plan fails to add the footnotes from the Clallam County Public Works Department 1-Assumes sewer main on the same side of the road as the property.  2-Add $2,000.00 if County Road must be crossed. 3-Based on ESTIMATES assembled by the CCAC (Carlsborg Community Advisory Council).  This plan also does not include the REAL cost of abatement of the old system, their estimate is $750.00 in total.  Actual is much higher as pumping costs alone are $350.00 - $375.00 which does not include excavating the tank, crushing the top, backfilling the empty tank and recovering the tank. 

One must read this entire Financial Plan to discover the real monthly costs.  They state $66.00 per month, if you take advantage of the “GET CONNECTED” loan program add $30.00 per month to the cost, if you are a private well owner an additional $12.00 to the monthly cost or the cost of metering your well and paying additional water use fees.  That would make the monthly fee $107.00 per month for those on a private well if they take the “LOAN” which would create an EXTRAORDINARY financial burden on those in the Carlsborg UGA with an Estimated median household income in 2012: $26,656 (it was $28,103 in 2000) Read more: http://www.city-data.com/city/Carlsborg-Washington.html#ixzz3Hg9sEoW3  Estimated per capita income in 2012: $16,758,  Median Average Age 60.3 years.  UNEMPLOYMENT IN 2013 9.0%

The arbitrary nature of the monthly fees of $66.00-$70.00 for those on PUD water and the increase to $78.00 minimum for those on private wells is discriminatory and appears punitive for having a private well as there is no way charge a fee to those on private wells without requiring them to spend additional money to install a meter, which is also not mentioned in the Financial Plan.

In light of these errors and other facts, I feel this plan is financially infeasible and should be withdrawn from loan approval and the entire plan scraped in favor of the LAMIRD alternative with owner financed cluster systems. The Carlsborg area should be down zoned to alleviate the burden on the water supply, aquifers and river.

Your consideration is appreciated,

Bryan Frazier
 




Mitigated Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE?

Mitigated Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE?

MITIGATE: (verb)
1. to lessen in force or intensity, as wrath, grief, harshness, or pain; moderate.
With whom did the county "MITIGATE", themselves, excluding public opinion?
DETERMINATION: (noun)
 1. the act of coming to a decision or of fixing or settling a purpose.   
By whom, the county, again excluding public opinion?
NON-: 
1.  a prefix meaning “NOT,” freely used as an English formative, usually with a simple negative force as implying mere negation or absence of something. 
SIGNIFICANCE: (noun)
1. importance; consequence:
2. meaning; import: 
3. the quality of being significant or having a meaning: 
NON-SIGNIFICANCE: 
Having no importance, consequence or meaning of significance.
Clallam County  the Board of County Commissioner (BOCC), The Department of Community Development (DCD) have determined amongst themselves that the cost of the Carlsborg Waste water Facility (sewer), the impact on the groundwater in the Carlsborg Urban Growth Area (UGA) (the aquifers, Dungeness River and streams) and the financial burden it will create on the citizens of the Carlsborg UGA to be of no consequence, importance, meaning or significance.  
The county has done so while IGNORING public input and opinion and ignoring their own county codes,development standards and our HOME RULE CHARTER.  The following is my opposition to this MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE sent to our Planning Manager Steve Gray.

Steve Gray, Planning Manager
Clallam County Department of Community Development
223 E. 4th Street, Suite 5
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Email: sgray@co.c1allam.wa.us
Phone: (360) 417-2520

Dear Mr. Gray:
I am writing in opposition to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) WAC 197-11
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE concerning the 2014 Carlsborg Wastewater Facilities Plan Amendment, Environmental Checklist Review, Case No. ECL 2014-00015.

Due to the Department of Community Development statement that you do not have the funding for Code Enforcement or Code Enforcement Officers, I believe that no further development should occur and no building permits should be approved until such time that the county can budget for and provide full time Code Enforcement throughout the county as required by the Home Rule Charter.  http://www.clallam.net/Board/assets/applets/2007_Charter.pdf

Section 4.25: Director of the Department of Community Development:
The Director of the Department of Community Development shall administer, enforce and advise the County Commissioners on all laws, except health, with respect to the environment, natural resources, and land and shoreline development, including, but not limited to, zoning, land divisions, environmental policy, building and fire codes, forest management, mining, agriculture, watershed planning, and floodplains.
(Emphasis Mine)

The Code Enforcement Officers shall take the necessary actions to correct the Code deficiencies and violations that exist in developments such as the Carlsborg Industrial Park in accordance with the Home Rule Charter and the Clallam County Codes and this should be completed prior to any further development or issuance of any building permits for the Carlsborg UGA including the Wastewater Facilities Plan (sewer system).

33.20.060 Development standards – Purpose and intent.
Development standards are established to ensure the compatibility of uses permitted within the Carlsborg UGA and to ensure the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. All uses located within the Carlsborg UGA shall be subject to the development standards, as applicable, set forth in this section.

(2) Landscaping. Landscaping for commercial, industrial, mixed use, duplex, and multifamily developments shall comply with Chapter 33.53 CCC, Landscaping Requirements. The use of existing native and/or drought-tolerant landscape materials shall be utilized whenever possible, and may be used in lieu or in combination with existing plantings to demonstrate substantial consistency with the plant and screening standards of Chapter 33.53 CCC. The landscaping plan shall also demonstrate compliance with the following performance standards:
(a) Landscaped areas between public roads and parking shall be provided;
(b) Outside storage, garbage, recycling and maintenance facilities, and loading dock areas shall be screened from view from public roads and neighboring properties;
(c) Commercial/industrial development abutting residential areas shall include a landscape plan that describes tree/shrub species, size of plant materials, and the use of fencing, berms, or solid walls so that noise, light, and aesthetic impacts to residential properties are adequately minimized and/or mitigated.


(3) Off-Street Parking. Parking for commercial, industrial, mixed use, duplex, and multifamily developments shall comply with Chapter 33.55 CCC, Parking Standards. The parking plan shall also demonstrate compliance with the following performance standards:
(a) Duplexes and multifamily residences shall provide no less than 1.5 parking spaces per unit. Parking areas shall be located behind or under buildings where practicable; except that, attached garages shall be allowed for duplexes.
(b) The number of access points from parking areas to public streets shall be minimized or shall be shared (where possible) within a development.
(c) Parking areas shall include landscaping, fencing and/or berming substantially equivalent to the standards in Chapter 33.55 CCC when abutting existing single-family residences or residential zoning districts.
(d) Where practicable, parking for commercial developments should be located to the rear of the development site.
(e) Parking lighting shall not create off-site glare, and shall utilize “cut-off” type fixtures that ensure glare will be downward facing and/or shielded and directed away from neighboring properties.

Mr. Gray, I find the County and especially the Department of Community Development incompetent and lack the necessary skills to bring order and “balance” needed to create and maintain any community development.


Sincerely,




Bryan Frazier




Cc: BOCC, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund Board.

        

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Low stream flow in Dungeness River No Surprise.

Low stream flow delays fishing opener on Dungeness River

Flow in the Dungeness River is well below the average flow for early October, state officials said, leaving Dungeness Chinook salmon, an Endangered Species Act-listed stock within the Puget Sound area, particularly susceptible to disturbance during their spawning activities.

State officials anticipate a rainfall sufficient to restore the Dungeness' stream flow and draw coho salmon into the river will happen by Oct. 16; otherwise, the closure may be extended.



 The County had been WARNED!

 Praying for Rain Won't Help.

 Clallam county has been warned over the years about the consequences of continued farmland conversion into residential and the impact on the water supply, they ignored it.  This county seems hell bent on the continued destruction of the Sequim Dungeness Valley and the Dungeness River most recently through rezoning in Carlsborg to allow 4-14 dwelling units per acre.  All the while the Pacific Coast Watershed Partnership and the The Dungeness River Management Team continue to seek funding to "Restore" the Dungeness River to " a closer copy of what it once was".  THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN!  http://www.pacificwatersheds.net/ontheground/dungeness.htm The Dungeness River will never see it's former glory so go ahead and remove all the dikes and levees, they don't matter any longer.   

With the continuing decline in river water level due to the lack of rainfall, snow pack and the nearly depleted Anderson Glacier Their efforts will result in a zero outcome, it's just pouring money down the drain. (pun intended).


Anderson Glacier 1936-2004 pair
Comparison photographs show the dramatic retreat of Anderson Glacier.

1936: Asahel Curtis 2004: Matt Hoffman, Portland State Univ.


 In one year from midnight October 1, 2013 to midnight October 1, 2014 the Cubic Feet Per Second (cfs) of the Dungeness River declined from 1,050cfs to 112cfs.

  Everything the county and the "team" have done to the Dungeness River in the last 25 years has been contrary to competent river management. They have removed almost everything natural or man made that would slow the river and let it spread out into the side (lateral) channels that help support Raparian Areas that provide spawning habitat and vegetation and wildlife.  Instead they have made it so that the river flows in the deepest channels with very little chance to spread to the side channels and support the raparian areas. See: Riparian Areas: Fish and Wildlife Havens



Sleeving the irrigation ditches thus drying up the shallow aquifer will lead to the Dungeness River as the MAJOR source of groundwater recharge leading to additional decrease of the in stream flow.  One bad thing leads to another, the county's HUBRIS, GREED and COGNITIVE DISSONANCE of facts like those in the report below fully support my claims.  Over Capitalization of Resources (over appropriated water) and Over Carrying Capacity of the Land (population) and damn the consequences, by all facts presented appear to be this county's MODUS OPERENDI.


THE WARNING

IMPACT OF CHANGES IN LAND USE ON THE
GROUND-WATER SYSTEM IN THE SEQUIM-DUNGENESS
PENINSULA, CLALLAM COUNTY, WASHINGTON
By B. W. Drost
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS
REPORT 83-4094

Tacoma, Washington
1983

ABSTRACT
In the Sequim-Dungeness peninsula, Clallam County, Washington, leakage from irrigation ditches is the most important source of ground-water recharge. Possible future land-use changes could lead to termination of the irrigation system. This would result in lower heads throughout the ground-water system, that could lead to well failures, increased pumping costs, seawater intrusion, and water-quality degradation. A digital-computer model was developed to simulate three-dimensional ground-water flow in aquifers underlying the peninsula in order to assess the impact of termination of the irrigation system. (Emphasis Mine.)

After 10-20 years of no irrigation, the model predicts that the water level in the water-table aquifer would have average declines of about 20 feet, some areas would become completely unsaturated, several hundred wells could go dry or nearly so, and leakage from the Dungeness River would become the major source of ground-water recharge. As of June 1980, ground-water quality in the study area has apparently not been affected by the use of on-site domestic sewage-disposal systems. The median nitrate-plus-nitrite (as N) concentration in the water-table aquifer was 0.35 milligrams per liter, and the maximum concentration was 2.5 milligrams per liter. (Emphasis Mine.)
The area has been extensively irrigated since about 1896 with water from the Dungeness River, which originates in the mountains to the south and flows through the middle of the area. Prior to irrigation, the area was sparsely vegetated and was subject to dry and barren summers 
(Keeting, 1976). (Emphasis Mine.)

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

2. The model confirms that leakage from the irrigation system is the largest source of recharge to the ground-water system. The leakage occurs primarily from the ditch system, not from water actually applied to fields.
3. Termination of the irrigation system would lead to lower heads throughout the ground-water system. The ground-water levels in the water-table aquifer could have average declines of about 20 feet, and some areas could become completely unsaturated. Several hundred wells could go dry. (Emphasis Mine.)